Can’t you drink sugar -free cola?The WHO is said to announce that Asba sweet may cause cancer

Financial News Agency, June 29 (Editor Xia Junxiong) According to the media quoted sources, the international cancer institution (IARC) under the World Health Organization plans to announce one provision next month that Asba is sweet as possible carcinogens.

Asba is one of the most common artificial sweeteners, and the main purpose is to be added in sugar -free cola and other beverages.As people pay more attention to health and control, all kinds of sugar -free drinks are becoming more and more popular.

People familiar with the matter said that IARC will announce the decision on July 14.Earlier this month, IARC’s external experts held a meeting and finally determined the decision.

It should be noted that the carcinogenic factors are divided into five categories based on the level of cancer:

Category 1: Cancer that has confirmed human beings

Class 2A: It is likely to be carcinogenic to humans

Category 2B: It is possible to cause cancer to humans

Category 3: Can’t determine whether it is carcinogenic to the human body

Category 4: Basically no carcinogenic effect on the human body

According to information disclosed by the media, IARC will list Asba sweet as "2B", which may cause cancer to humans.

The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization Food Additive Joint Expert Committee (JECFA) also investigated the impact of Asba’s sweetness on human health. The agency held a meeting at the end of June and will also announce its investigation results on July 14.

Since 1981, JECFA has stated that it is safe to eat Asba sweetly within the acceptable daily intake range.In the past, the agency believed that a 60 kg of adults drank 12 to 36 bottles of sugar -free drinks a day (specifically depending on the sweet content in sugar -free drinks), and there would be a risk of harm to health.This view has been widely recognized by regulatory agencies including the United States and Europe.

A spokesman for IARC said that the survey results of IARC and JECFA are currently confidential, but the two results are complementary. IARC’s conclusion represents "the first basic step of understanding the carcinogenicity", and JECFA is responsible for the "risk assessment of risk assessmentDetermine the possibility of specific types of hazards (such as cancer) under specific conditions and exposure levels. "

Although IARC’s decision may have a huge impact, the agency’s previous decision has also received some controversy. For some unavoidable substances or conditions, the agency issued unnecessary alarms.For example, IARC lists edible red meat and uses mobile phones as the "possible carcinogenic" category, which is similar to Asba.

Frances Hunt-Wood, Secretary-General of the International Sweet Origin Association, criticized that IARC is not a food safety institution. They are not scientifically comprehensive about Asba’s assessment, and they are largely questioned based on highly questioned research.

This article originated from Xia Junxiong

Pregnancy Test Midstream 5-Tests